We're sorry, but this discussion has just been closed to further replies.
Tags: foreign, interventionism, neocons, policy, war
Replies are closed for this discussion.
Our financial system and economy are in ruins. We can't afford a trillion dollar a year foreign policy and we can't afford to police the world. It has nothing to do with being "pansies". Of all the terrorists who committed 911, the British bombings, the Spanish train bombings, the USS Cole, the bombing of our 2 embassies in Africa, Mumbai and numerous other terror attacks around the globe, none were from Iraq. Most hailed from Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Egypt. That's because Islamic terrorism is propelled by an extreme form of Sunni Islam that was born and nurtured in Saudi Arabia but exported mostly to Pakistan and Egypt. Also, none of the terrorists were from Iran nor were any of them even Shiite.
The bottom line is that our foreign policy is an expensive disaster. Hussein did not have WMD's. I invite you to read my blog posts because I've posted some excellent articles.
Finally, the "bomb, bomb, bomb Iran" McCain lost by over 8.5 million votes, Obama crushed the GOP in the electoral college vote with 365, and the GOP witnessed 9 red states that turn blue (OH,FL,VA,NC,IA,IN,NV,NM,CO).
Over 70% of the American people oppose the Bush wars because the American people simply do not like war. If we are going to march off to war, we should have Congress declare war as is required by the Constitution.
I understand that foreign policy is a huge divide among conservatives. But conservatives notwithstanding, we need a foreign policy that will be accepted by the majority of the American voters.
Jim:
There are many polls showing that about 70% of the American people oppose the Iraq war. Here's one:
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/08/poll-iraq-war-oppos...
Quote: "Sixty-eight percent of poll respondents opposed the war, setting a new record. The level of opposition is slightly up from last month and 1 percentage point higher than the previous record of 67 percent, first set in December 2006 in a CNN/Opinion Research survey."
But the most telling poll of all was the election results on 11/4. Obama sailed to victory on the promise that he would end the Iraq war.
Liberals are already moaning that Obama will not deliver on his promises.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1208/16292.html
Liberals voice concerns about Obama
Quote: "..some are shedding a reluctance to puncture the liberal euphoria at being rid of President George W. Bush to say, in effect, that the new boss looks like the old boss."
On the WMD issue, the CIA issued a report stating that no WMD's were ever found in Iraq. Hussein had no weapons grade plutonium or the means to make it.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7634313/
CIA’s final report: No WMD found in Iraq
Quote: "In his final word, the CIA’s top weapons inspector in Iraq said Monday that the hunt for weapons of mass destruction has “gone as far as feasible” and has found nothing, closing an investigation into the purported programs of Saddam Hussein that were used to justify the 2003 invasion.
“After more than 18 months, the WMD investigation and debriefing of the WMD-related detainees has been exhausted,” wrote Charles Duelfer, head of the Iraq Survey Group, in an addendum to the final report he issued last fall.
“As matters now stand, the WMD investigation has gone as far as feasible.”
In 92 pages posted online Monday evening, Duelfer provides a final look at an investigation that occupied over 1,000 military and civilian translators, weapons specialists and other experts at its peak. His latest addenda conclude a roughly 1,500-page report released last fall.
Another addendum also noted that military forces in Iraq may continue to find small numbers of degraded chemical weapons — most likely misplaced or improperly destroyed before the 1991 Gulf War. In an insurgent’s hands, “the use of a single even ineffectual chemical weapon would likely cause more terror than deadlier conventional explosives,” another addendum said."
It's also true that a lot of the degraded chemical weapons that were found were given to Saddam Hussein by the U.S. for use in the Iran/Iraq war. Additionally, it was the U.S. who provided Hussein with the technology to produce chemical weapons. There's a great photo out there with Don Rumsfeld warmly shaking hands with Hussein and there is no doubt that Rumsfeld was instrumental in arming Hussein with chemical weapon technology.
Look, I understand that we are world's apart on the issue. Frankly, I consider myself a recovering neocon but when the truth started hitting me, I accepted it.
Here's the problem: until the GOP and its factions can come to an agreement on foreign policy, we cannot Rebuild the Party. Too much has been lost. The election results attest to that.
As I recall, the war mongering United State has been reducing the number of military installations worldwide since the Clinton Administration.
I even believe that "bomb, bomb, bomb Iran "McCain" supported three rounds of unscheduled closures in 2001, 2003, and 2005.
http://www.defenselink.mil/brac/
Where do these people come from?
© 2009 Created by Rebuild the Party on Ning. Create a Ning Network!