We have too many LIBERAL Repbulicans including our governor who embrace the Junk Science of Global warming, support the bail out, open borders, and PORK. How can we get beyond the committees and party enablers of these vile types!?

Share

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Replies to This Discussion

A few questions. How do you know global warming is junk science? Also, what are the problems from open borders? I know bailout mania and pork are big problems, I agree with you there. The other two issues, I think I know the problem with those, but I wonder what you think they are.
you ought to use your name Farted windnut
First off, what is a definition of a rino? One that disagree's with you? Remember, not all regions of the country hold the same definition of the same words, in the North East a moderate is A conservative. Same in the North West. Down south or in the southwest they pretty much all call themselves conservatives because of their traditional beliefs. Now yes we have to purge our party of those who really do not follow what would be the typical traditional fiscal conservative roots, but to label one a RINO because they are from a region or area different from yours with different definitions makes you look like an angry and uneducted puppet. Now Open borders, pork and the bail out are good topics, let's talk about how to reverse the damage being done to our society by these actions and we will find those whom we all can agree with and elect them into the majority.
who you talkin too?

Jim Rock said:
you ought to use your name Farted windnut
Mr. Rosk, well go to a good friend of mines website for starters http://m4gw.com for a 101 primer then get back to me. other then the arctic is growing, volcanoes emit more CO2 then man could ever hope to, and we used to have vinyards in Canada "hence the vikings name for it, Vinland" should be a starter.

What are the problem with open borders? Wow Do you what makes up a country, economy, and what the constitution says about it. Read the CONSTITUTION and get back to me on this one too.

Rosk said:
A few questions. How do you know global warming is junk science? Also, what are the problems from open borders? I know bailout mania and pork are big problems, I agree with you there. The other two issues, I think I know the problem with those, but I wonder what you think they are.
SELLOUTs, people who do things like Blago of Illinois did (I know he's a dem) Those who want to ban guns, go against conservative principles on more then just a couple of things. I.e. John McCain... Perhaps elite sellouts might be a better term then RINO if you prefer.

Michael Brennan said:
First off, what is a definition of a rino? One that disagree's with you? Remember, not all regions of the country hold the same definition of the same words, in the North East a moderate is A conservative. Same in the North West. Down south or in the southwest they pretty much all call themselves conservatives because of their traditional beliefs. Now yes we have to purge our party of those who really do not follow what would be the typical traditional fiscal conservative roots, but to label one a RINO because they are from a region or area different from yours with different definitions makes you look like an angry and uneducted puppet. Now Open borders, pork and the bail out are good topics, let's talk about how to reverse the damage being done to our society by these actions and we will find those whom we all can agree with and elect them into the majority.
Sometimes the best solution is that you have to find a group of liked minded REPUBLICANS in your local area who have enough courage to work at getting these rino's out of office. If you are not ready to ruffle some feathers than I would personally advise trying to lead this charge. You have to decide what price you are willing to pay in order to ensure that true REPUBLICANS are elected. I will warn you that it is a battle and you will face a lot of opposition but it is a battle worth fighting in the end.

RINO- Republican in Name Only
RINO- Republican in Name Only

joe 6 pack said:
SELLOUTs, people who do things like Blago of Illinois did (I know he's a dem) Those who want to ban guns, go against conservative principles on more then just a couple of things. I.e. John McCain... Perhaps elite sellouts might be a better term then RINO if you prefer.

Michael Brennan said:
First off, what is a definition of a rino? One that disagree's with you? Remember, not all regions of the country hold the same definition of the same words, in the North East a moderate is A conservative. Same in the North West. Down south or in the southwest they pretty much all call themselves conservatives because of their traditional beliefs. Now yes we have to purge our party of those who really do not follow what would be the typical traditional fiscal conservative roots, but to label one a RINO because they are from a region or area different from yours with different definitions makes you look like an angry and uneducted puppet. Now Open borders, pork and the bail out are good topics, let's talk about how to reverse the damage being done to our society by these actions and we will find those whom we all can agree with and elect them into the majority.
Joe 6 pack,
again, what is your scientific evidence of global warming? Anecdotes without sources just doesn't count. Your friends site has some interesting information and I don't agree with politicizing the weather, but I don't think we have to blow off scientific studies without listening to their reasoning and even their proof. Personally, I think it's likely natural cycles the Earth is experiencing, but again, do we have to just blow people off like they are wackos just because we don't agree with them? That makes us, conservatives and GOP voters, seem like nuts ourselves.

Additionally, I work in the legal field, I've read the Constitution numerous times, but I've never, ever seen a passage regarding "open borders" or "illegal immigrants". Can you point me to the precise Article so I could better understand where you are coming from?
In fact, I think I do know where you're coming from. I agree with you more than you would think. I'm all in favor of building a wall from the Pacific to the Gulf of Mexico. Also, I've got no problem bolstering the Border Patrol with Nat. Guard. But, I think its impossible to round up 10-15 million illegals currently living here and shipping them home. It sounds too much like some middle-20th Century European plan, a la Germany or Russia. They are here and we should work hard to assimilate them into our culture, while at the same time securing the border to keep it sealed tight against future waves of illegals.

joe 6 pack said:
Mr. Rosk, well go to a good friend of mines website for starters http://m4gw.com for a 101 primer then get back to me. other then the arctic is growing, volcanoes emit more CO2 then man could ever hope to, and we used to have vinyards in Canada "hence the vikings name for it, Vinland" should be a starter.

What are the problem with open borders? Wow Do you what makes up a country, economy, and what the constitution says about it. Read the CONSTITUTION and get back to me on this one too.

Rosk said:
A few questions. How do you know global warming is junk science? Also, what are the problems from open borders? I know bailout mania and pork are big problems, I agree with you there. The other two issues, I think I know the problem with those, but I wonder what you think they are.
You know, labeling people as "RINOs" is counterproductive. This is precisely the attitude that has caused the GOP to lose this election. I'm a small-government, financially conservative Republican. I'm pro-military, against gun bans, against abortion yet, I'm all right with gay marriage, for promoting responsible sexuality (i.e. not abstinence only) to teenagers, for moves that would decriminalize certain amounts of marijuana (which is truly in the best interest of streamlining the justice system.) etc. My beliefs have been carefully reasoned and well thought out, and it's led me to ultimately believe that the Republican Party is the better party. I don't think this makes me any less of a Republican than others and I resent indications that I should be excluded because I don't fall into lock-step extremes. I volunteered for the McCain campaign for 8 months and have been involved in Republican groups for about a year or two now.
It's time for those of us who are politically active to grow up and get past this cliquey, "you're not a real Republican" attitude. I'm not saying that the party needs to be expanded to include those who are mostly liberal or truly liberal, but there needs to be a place for more moderate Republicans in the party. Alienating people the people who support you is not beneficial to anyone.
punch them in the face! lol
actually it might be better to have RINOS in office in areas where conservative candidates won't make it. I would much rather have RINO fighting against me than a Barney Frank type. NEW YOrk would never vote a conservative, only a RINO will do. Its just the name of the game
Did you say Barney Frank? http://www.anybodybutbarney.com

GhettoConservative said:
punch them in the face! lol
actually it might be better to have RINOS in office in areas where conservative candidates won't make it. I would much rather have RINO fighting against me than a Barney Frank type. NEW YOrk would never vote a conservative, only a RINO will do. Its just the name of the game

RSS

About

© 2009   Created by Rebuild the Party on Ning.   Create a Ning Network!

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service