Matthew

Mark Sanford - the Future for the GOP - NO JINDAL - TRUE CONSERVATIVISM

this is the kind of Conservative the party needs.

please viw this video to understand my point, The Southern Avenger talks about the future for the GOP and how we DONT need a Jindal


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJX2AkAzsko

Tags: 2012, conservative, election, future, libertarian, mark, republican, sanford, south

Share

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Replies to This Discussion

Plenty of disruption from just ourselves if you ask me. I have been following all the threads for awhile and I have not read anything from willmorth that would make me think what you are accusing him of. The man has stated his stance and so far has not veered from it. He claims to be a lifetime conservative just as you and I do. So far his actions in here support that.
We have 4 long hard years in front of us to rebuild, reshape, and re-energize this party. If being paranoid over every single person who may have an opinion that differs from mine or yours as a democrat shill, then it is gonna be an extra long 4 years for you.
Where I come from a man/woman's word is good enough until they prove differently. If willmorth is here to help rebuild our party and is gonna vote republican, then I do not want to lose him or any other person who votes republican. Now if you are gonna vote democrat, then get the hell out and stay out.
Lets don't drive away republicans when we are trying to recruit them at the sametime. There are some so called diehard republicans in here that by their posts alone will and have driven some folks out and away.
We are all adults in here so form your own opinions on each other. I for one do not need anyone to tell me who to trust, believe, or listen to. I like many others in here are fully capable to make our own determinations as to who we think are for the party and who are not. If I feel someone is a plant, then I'll ignore them.
Whether I agree or disagree with boudicca, she brings intelligent and thought out opinions in here and can disagree without being disagreeable. That alone is a lesson that some in here should learn and incorporate into their portfolio to help us rebuild the party. If you are asked to go out to the streets and help recruit people to our party, then having the skills to debate/argue without being disagrreable is a big plus. Nothing will drive new members away from our party faster than calling them names when you disagree with them.
They used to call Reagan the great communicator. Much to learn from him even today when it comes to dealing with people. I'm getting older each day and still have alot to learn myself. Everyone in here has offered me something to learn from, both the good and the bad.
Cowboy and group

WHOA THERE PEOPLE I have been reading this site for a long while and find that the debate is good and honest. Opinions are like butts, everyone has one and some have two. The whole list of people and I have debated with logic and decorum. No discussion needs foul language and bad attitudes to over state you own ability to debate.

Set out a premise, discuss it and come to some conclusion - your peers here will then review it for free. Yes you will receive much more value from this approach than you pay in effort to be enemy - mine.
Well, I agree with Randy there, he makes good points, but I'll reserve judgement about Willmorth myself. I've also seen the Ron Paul and Obama votes going from his list, which certainly are not the folks to rebuild the party for heaven's sakes.

Then, as Mike outlines with his reasoning, if we don't agree with Ron Paulsters, we're Neo-con Republicans?

Soros is at it again with his minute-brained legions. Have to disagree with Cowboy about Boudicca though. She and Paul Metcalf, post some actual conservative principles from time to time, then actually post pictures from a jihadist website, (confirmed by two military members here who traced the photo's source) and directly from some admitted and acknowledged liberal presses bent on spinning facts to weaken GOP positions, not strengthen them.

For every fact Boudicca posts, she cites terrible lies in the same threads, then backs the lies with a reason about how she's "Christian" so she must be right and we must agree with her.

Did Reagan ever call another GOP supporter/group murders? Boudicca does. She even lies about me threatening her life for crying out loud.

Respect you Cowboy, but not @$$es bent on disruption here. Intelligent or not, they always slip up and should be escorted out the web portal.
Terrence, what it seems is that you and another seek to inflame the Ron Paul people into slipping up and getting us tos'd. You should expend your energy on this forum in a more positive way.
Suzanne:

I'm here until I'm kicked off. I really don't care what Terrence and his ilk do.

Viva le Ron Paul Revolution!!

We Shall Overcome the Neocons!!

RSS

About

© 2009   Created by Rebuild the Party on Ning.   Create a Ning Network!

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service